Windows Mobile is too late with too little…..

There I was, sitting in Las Vegas Airport after CES. The WiFi in the airport is now ’sponsored’ by Google. Indeed when I brought up my favorite time-killing web game, the Nexus One had the primary GoogleAds position, waiting for me to click. As I’m currently looking at my bricked HTC Touch Pro, I easily resisted. Others have not, and are buying. What they say afterwards in some cases has been negative, although it’s otherwise being well received.

Data suggests that Google’s Nexus One didn’t have the sales explosion that Motorola’s Droid did during the opening week campaign. Worse, Google’s been slammed about problem with its US carrier partner, T-Mobile. Google will learn. One gets the feeling that the relationship with T-Mobile was a given, as AT&T wouldn’t carry the phone, and AT&T is the only other viable GSM partner in the US.

LG announced that more than half its new smartphones will use Android, the common operating system among the Nexus One, Droid, G1, and so on.

Windows Mobile seems like Windows Stationary, as Microsoft’s Version 7 of its operating system seems to be MIA. In the interim, the business ecosystems of the iPhone and Android and even Moblin continue to grow and perhaps flourish. Capturing huge marketshare is what Microsoft is all about, so I find it head-scratchingly strange that Windows Mobile is so far behind.

What will happen? Microsoft will have lost mindshare, just like Apple’s loss of mindshare over its late release of its iSlate. This is curious– two venerable leaders, known for building ecosystems and fulfillment mechanisms, left in the dust. They’re not going to like that.

[via ITWORLD]

If the iPhone didn’t finish off Windows Mobile in the smartphone market, the Motorola Droid may.

Windows Mobile is losing the last vestiges of its mojo–if it really had any to begin with–as the Droid and other phones based on the Android 2.0 operating system push the buzz meter needle into the red zone. Many in the media–which can play a big role in steering users to one technology platform or another–sense that Windows Mobile has now been relegated resolutely to has-been status.

The Motorola Droid's high-resolution screen

The Motorola Droid’s high-resolution screen.

(Credit: Verizon)

Let’s do a quick canvas of what some in the press are saying now that we’re at the start of the Droid era. A post on SFGate.com (the Web site of the San Francisco Chronicle) is, like other commentary out there, clearly dismissive of Windows Mobile. “Curiously, Microsoft is nowhere to be seen in this battle royal,” the author states, referring to the iPhone and Android.

And there’s this more damning comment from a blog at SeattlePI.com. “Rarely mentioned, however, is another player in the mobile OS market–Microsoft. Why not? Because not many people in the smartphone world seem to really give a hoot about Windows Mobile anymore.”

The litany of like articles is long. This post on PC World asks: “Has Microsoft Placed Its Last Mobile Bet?” The article cites research from Canalys showing Windows Mobile slipping from 13.9 percent of the worldwide smartphone market in 2002 to 9 percent in the second quarter of 2009.

The numbers are even less favorable in an accounting by ad service Admob, which compiles data on which operating systems are in use on mobile devices that access online ads. In August, according to AdMob, Windows Mobile had only a 4 percent share of the mobile OS market worldwide, down from 7 percent in February.

But getting back to my original premise of no mobile mojo for Windows. The fact is that consumers don’t care about Windows on smartphones. In other words, while Windows seems to be a prerequisite for many consumers when buying a PC, it just doesn’t come into play in a big way in a smartphone purchase.

This will have ramifications beyond Microsoft of course. Companies like Toshiba (and its attractive TG01 smartphone) will probably not be as successful on Windows Mobile as they would (will) be on Android 2.0. Or, at the very least, will not get the necessary buzz.

Then there’s the Intel factor. Intel also wants to be a player, eventually, in the smartphone space. If it is indeed able to beat back Texas Instruments (whose chip is used in the Droid), Samsung (iPhone), Qualcomm (BlackBerry), and Marvell, it probably won’t do it by sticking to the tried-and-true “WinTel” combination that’s been so outrageously successful in the PC space.

And Intel is chasing a fast-moving target. TI, and all the other ARM-based chip suppliers cited above, are slated to bring out dual-core designs that can hit speeds as high as 2GHz (think next-generation tablets and media pads). In other words, they’ll also be able claim the coveted speed mantle on phones, such as the Droid, where Windows Mobile is no where in sight.

So the Droid may not be the iPhone killer but rather the Windows Mobile slayer. Microsoft, of course, will always have the unassailable PC franchise. But, wait, isn’t Android coming to Netbooks next year? Maybe the real battle royal for Microsoft is yet to come.

[via cnet]

 

Acer has showcased what it claims is the first netbook which comes with both Google’s mobile platform, Android, and Microsoft’s very own Windows 7, which is scheduled to be launched on the 22nd of October.

In reality though, the laptop it unveiled earlier today is not a proper dual booting machine. You can only boot up in Google’s open source OS either from a clean start or if yuo do a restart. To go in Windows 7, you must start Android and select a “Switch OS” from Android’s slide out menu.

This is a rather new approach to implementing dual booting on x86 compatible computers. There is normally a simplified menu that allows you to select which OS you want to log into; others like Dell with the Latitude Z have grafted a separate Linux-based computer altogether on top of the Windows setup.

Acer however went the other way and Windows 7 appears to be the parasitic OS since by default, the user logs into Android rather than Windows 7. It is not known whether this can be changed or if it is hard coded.

Obviously, the main advantage of using Android is that you will be able to start using your application within seconds (18 seconds before you can “chat” say the marketing guys) and a super fast shutdown (down to a mere 3 seconds).

It is also an absolute boon for people who already own an Android-based mobile phone and who will be in (very) familiar territories. The only questions that remain are (a) where are the Smartbooks (b) hpw will Microsoft react (c) when will it go on sale.

Our Comments
The D250 is an existing product which doesn’t come with any features that sets it apart from the dozens of other netbooks already on the market. It has a 1.6GHz Atom Processor, 1GB SDRAM, a 160GB hard disk drive and a 10.1-inch 1024×600 LED-backlit LCD display. It is already available for as little as £232 http://www.ebuyer.com/product/161005 including delivery from Ebuyer albeit with Windows XP only.

[via ITProPortal]

 

Dell, the computer and services company which recently announced it will acquire Perot Systems, is also getting into the smartphone market – but using Google’s, not Microsoft’s, software.

The company is understood to be preparing to launch the phone next year on AT&T’s network, which already carries the Apple iPhone.

It will be launching into an increasingly crowded market, presently dominated by Apple and RIM, which makes the BlackBerry. However Google’s Android platform, launched only last year, is making inroads, partly because it carries no licensing costs and can be tweaked by phone makers as they wish.

But the decision to go with Android is a blow to Microsoft’s Windows Mobile operating system, which has just received a substantial revamp that the company had hoped would boost its fortunes in the smartphone market.

A source with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters that Dell plans to introduce a U.S. version of its “oPhone” for China – which runs on Android – and that the device had been certified by AT&T for its domestic network.

The Wall Street Journal, which broke the news on Wednesday, cited people briefed on the matter as saying Dell’s phone could be launched as soon as early 2010.

Worldwide factory shipments of smart phones are expected to rise from 184.2m in 2009 to 235.6m units in 2010, up 27.9%, according to the analysis company iSuppli. That compares to 12.3% decline projected for mobile phones overall in 2009.

But analysts warn that the world’s No. 2 PC maker would face a tough challenge in a market already crowded with competition. On Wednesday, South Korea’s Samsung said it would also begin selling an Android phone through Sprint Nextel’s network.

Others including Taiwanese rivals Acer and Asustek Computer are moving into smartphones, which tend to offer higher margins than PCs.

Dell spokesman Andrew Bowins declined comment on the AT&T tie-up but told Reuters: “We are deeply engaged with our operator partners around the world to deliver mobile broadband enabled computing devices.”

He added: “We haven’t announced anything around voice or Android although we continue to explore opportunities in those areas with operators around the world.”

Google declined comment, as did AT&T. But a spokesman for the telecoms giant, Michael Coe, said: “We expect to sell Android phones in the future.”

Dell has been coy about its plans, although such a move has been rumored ever since it hired Ron Garriques from Motorola in 2007 to lead its consumer products division. The American chip designer Marvell Technology had developed the “oPhone” platform for mobile phone makers who wanted to make smartphones without investing the associated research and development costs. Dell was one of the first companies to sign up to make them.

Marvell subsequently came up with a mobile device for China Mobile Ltd – a large, touchscreen phone.

The Wall Street Journal, citing people briefed on the matter, reported that Dell’s Android phone for AT&T would also come with a touchscreen and a camera. “They’ve been working on a phone for awhile,” said Kaufman Bros analyst Shaw Wu. “But it’s going to be really hard for them to differentiate from what’s already on the market.”

Forrester Research analyst Charles Golvin said a partnership between Dell and AT&T would make sense given the flurry of announcements around Android smartphones. “It’s pretty natural that these other guys are going to jump on the Android bandwagon… From AT&T’s perspective, it’s a gap that they’re looking to fill. Get an Android phone, get one that’s different than the one everybody else is offering.”

But Golvin cautioned that Dell does not have a strong track record moving into areas where it has little experience. Other analysts noted that Android was generating plenty of momentum.

“The goal here of Google is to make the Android operating system a real alternative to that of Apple, Research In Motion’s Blackberry and Palm,” said C.L. King and Associates analyst Lawrence Harris.

Google is gaining some traction with its fledgling software. On Tuesday, it said it was partnering with Verizon Wireless to co-develop multiple phones based on Android. They plan to bring two phones to market this year. Verizon Wireless is a venture of Verizon Communications Inc and Vodafone Group Plc.

Other Android phones include Motorola’s recently announced Cliq, and HTC’s Hero, slated for U.S. release next week.

By Charles Arthur

[via guardian.co.uk]

 

Fanbois and girls alike constantly debate the future mobile operating landscape. Is there room enough for all of the current platforms or will there be just a few? From a consumer standpoint, there’s room for plenty of competitors — after all, choice is good, right? But more choices can play havoc with the finances of the companies that produce handsets. With a fixed budget of resources — in a tight economy, no less — handset makers need to judiciously manage their resources and devote them strategically.

Acer is reportedly doing just that, says Digitimes, and they’re adding to the growing trend of phone makers who are joining the Android army.

The company’s focus will shift from Windows Mobile to Google’s operating system, with at least half of their 2010 phones running Android. Palm and Motorola have already enlisted at the expense of Windows Mobile, but neither was a particular big player when compared to other WinMo licensees. What I find fascinating about all this is that we’re not hearing phone makers switch to Android from any other platform besides Windows Mobile. That insinuates Android is seen as the future by several handset makers, because they don’t feel that Microsoft’s mobile OS can compete with Apple’s or RIM’s. It leaves them little choice and could set up two or three big mobile platforms owning the market majority.

But Windows Mobile clearly isn’t headed for the morgue just yet. LG is on-board as a recent licensee and plans over 50 handsets running WinMo. Version 6.5 of the operating system hits handsets next week and I’m already taking an early look at it. I can’t say more until next week, so stay tuned. And next year, Windows Mobile 7 offers Microsoft another chance to reinvent itself as a leader in this space. In fact, some analysts are already expecting that to happen — yesterday, iSuppli forecast that by 2012, WinMo will regain the second place worldwide smartphone market share it lost last year. iSuppli bases this on Microsoft as the only player to offer a “complete set of services that can assist clients in their customization and software integration efforts.

Back in the day, that might have been a strong selling point, but from where I stand, that’s not enough. If it were, would handset makers be jumping on the Android train one by one? Again, we can intelligently debate which OS is best for us, but at the end of the day, you can’t argue there’s a growing trend happening right before our eyes.

[via jkOnTheRun]



Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow Us On Twitter   qrcode
Visit Us On Your Mobile, Use The QR Code Above